samedi 30 janvier 2016

A Review Of Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

By Edward Thomas


Surgery has evolved in a great way in the last few decades. Unlike in the past, when the main objective was to restore functionality, cosmesis appear to carry a lot of significance these days. In Ne York city for example, patients are increasingly requesting for smaller incisions so as to reduce the sizes of scars. This is perhaps what gave rise to laparoscopic surgery and most recently, single incision laparoscopic surgery. In this article we explore what exactly this operation is and what its benefits and downsides are.

As the name suggests, this is minimally invasive type of surgery in which a single port of entry is used. This entry point is in most cases the navel of the patient. Like many other types of surgeries, this operation is done under general anesthesia. It is also known as single port laparoscopy (SPL) or single port access surgery (SPA). The traditional laparoscopic technique requires three separate incisions to be made.

There are a number of surgical operations that can be performed using this technique. They include gallbladder removal, repair of inguinal and incisional hernias, appendectomy and the removal of pelvic organs such as the ovary and the uterus among others. This list continues to grow by the day as better instruments are invented to make it easier to perform such operations.

One of the advantages is that there is less pain as compared to the traditional approach of laparoscopy. As a result, the patients tend to heal a lot faster. It also yields better results cosmetically bearing in mind that only a small opening is made. The main undoing would be the fact that it is marginally expensive than the traditional methods primarily due to the specialized equipment that is used.

It is important to mention that using the technique is a lot more cumbersome than the traditional methods. Using the same opening for all the instruments may not be that easy for surgeons who are not adequately experienced. This is because instrument crowding obscures the view and the distance from the incision site to the target site is often longer. As a result, the risk of intraoperative injury is higher than in other methods without proper training.

The option is not suitable for persons that are very obese, those with a history of other operations and those with a grossly enlarged abdominal organ. In the event that it is not possible to complete the operation using the single incision, an additional port will be created to proceed with the traditional approach. This happens in 5% to 10% of cases. The open technique may be required in rare circumstances.

Just as is the case with any surgical operation, risks exist. Bleeding and infections are the most common but their incidence is a lot lower than what is seen with other techniques. Incisional hernias, a common complications of open operations, is a very rare occurrence.

This surgical technique has a wide range of applications. It is set to be the main technique in the management of pediatric and gynecological surgical problems. Many training institutions have now incorporated the practice into their curricula and plan to retrain specialist surgeons and residents.




About the Author:



Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire